This Is Not A Blue Bottle 1.7 Eau de Parfum 60 ml

Histoires de Parfums

This Is Not A Blue Bottle 1.7 unites coconut, pink pepper, rose and frangipani with vanilla and sandalwood into a sunlit scent.

€ 135,00
1 workday
  • Luxury niche fragrances in one place
  • Sample first, buy with confidence
  • Ordered before 1:00 PM, shipped the same day
  • Secure payment
Do you have a question about this product?

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Description

This Is Not A Blue Bottle 1.7

Inspiration
This is a sunbeam, a radiant joy that enchants every moment. A coconut-rose warmth undulates between sandalwood and white musk. A vibrant ecstasy.

Fragrance Family
Floral and solar

The Olfactive Composition
Top notes: pink pepper, coconut, ozonic accord
Heart notes: rose, lily of the valley, frangipani
Base notes: vanilla, musk, sandalwood

The Signature of This Is Not A Blue Bottle 1.7
Pink pepper, coconut and an ozonic accord open sunny. Rose, lily of the valley and frangipani form a creamy floral heart. Vanilla, musk and sandalwood give a warm, soft base.

What our ParfuMaria team thinks of this fragrance
A coconut rose may sound unexpected, yet in 1.7 it works wonderfully well. Histoires de Parfums describes it as a vibrant ecstasy, a coconut-rose warmth undulating between sandalwood and white musk. We first smell the pink pepper, giving a small spark, and then right away the soft coconut with a fresh, ozonic breeze behind it. That contrast between creamy and airy makes the opening very pleasant. Then come the flowers: rose, lily of the valley and frangipani, light and sunny, with a tropical tint that never becomes heavy. In the base vanilla and musk bring warmth and sandalwood gives a creamy, woody softness that lingers long. For us 1.7 is a scent that changes your mood without being loud. It suits summer dresses, linen and long evenings outdoors. The 60 ml bottle slips easily into your beach bag or suitcase.

Reviews

No reviews yet

Please contact us

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Add review

What do you think of the article?

5,0