RVDK X SALLE PRIVÉE Eau de Parfum 100ml

Salle Privee
RVDK X SALLE PRIVÉE
RVDK X SALLE PRIVÉE

green leaves, bergamot oil, Sichuan pepper oil, raspberry Clove Symtrap®, linalool (upcycled), tuberose absolute, orris, coffee extract andalwood dreches, cedarwood oil, amber, pyrogenated labdanum,

286,00 *
  • Luxury niche fragrances in one place
  • Sample first, buy with confidence
  • Delivered quickly
  • Secure payment
Do you have a question about this product?

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Description

The Mind Vaccine by Salle Privée x RVDK is a rebellious yet refined unisex perfume that challenges the status quo. Crafted in collaboration with Ronald van der Kemp, the world’s first ethical couture designer, and star perfumer Isaac Sinclair, this scent is a manifesto of modern luxury and sustainable beauty.

An unapologetic olfactive explosion, The Mind Vaccine opens with vibrant green leaves, juicy raspberry and a spicy kick of Sichuan pepper oil. At the heart lies a sophisticated blend of creamy tuberose, orris, coffee extract and upcycled notes like Clove Symtrap® and linalool, creating an intoxicating floral-spiced accord. The base is a warm, grounding composition of sandalwood dreches, cedarwood oil, musk and smoky pyrogenated labdanum.

This fragrance is as bold in message as it is in scent—inviting you to embrace positivity, eccentricity and responsible hedonism. Housed in the iconic Salle Privée bottle with a cap made from recycled materials, it’s presented in a vibrant red box lined with recycled wool—designed to be re-used as a perfumed pouch for your wardrobe.

Are you ready for your next shot of optimism?

Top notes: green leaves, bergamot oil, Sichuan pepper oil, raspberry
Heart notes: Clove Symtrap®, linalool (upcycled), tuberose absolute, orris, coffee extract
Base notes: sandalwood dreches, cedarwood oil, amber, pyrogenated labdanum, musk

Reviews

No reviews yet

Please contact us

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Add review

What do you think of the article?

5,0