Cannabis Intense Extrait de Parfum 100 ml

Fragrance Du Bois
Fragrance Du Bois Cannabis Intense Fragrance Du Bois Cannabis Intense Fragrance Du Bois Cannabis Intense
Fragrance Du Bois Cannabis Intense
Fragrance Du Bois Cannabis Intense
Fragrance Du Bois Cannabis Intense

Cannabis leaf with saffron and nutmeg, introduced by cardamom and orange and resting on Trat oud oil and cedarwood.

€ 295,00
per unit
1 werkdag
  • Luxury niche fragrances in one place
  • Sample first, buy with confidence
  • Ordered before 1:00 PM, shipped the same day
  • Secure payment
Do you have a question about this product?

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Description

Cannabis Intense

Inspiration
Cannabis Intense is the result of long experimentation and the skill of a master perfumer: a refined, avant-garde scent with a smooth, rounded composition and distinctive fresh green notes.

Fragrance Family
Green, woody

The Olfactive Composition
Top notes: Cardamom, pink pepper, orange
Heart notes: Cannabis notes, saffron, nutmeg
Base notes: Trat oud oil, cedarwood, musk, woody accord

The Signature of Cannabis Intense
The scent opens with a bold note of cardamom, punctuated by the rosy pop of pink pepper and an energising splash of orange. The heart reveals green, spicy yet sweet tones: cannabis, exotic saffron and aromatic nutmeg. Pure Trat oud oil, cedarwood, musk and a woody accord provide a long, warm breath.

What our ParfuMaria team thinks of this fragrance
Cannabis Intense is warmer and rounder than its blue sibling, and often the first encounter with this British house. The saffron and nutmeg give the green leaf a soft, spicy embrace, making the whole almost velvety. We smell a spice market in the evening sun, with a breath of wood from the stalls. It sparks curiosity, and yet you can easily wear it every day. The Trat oud stays subtle and mostly lends depth, never a barnyard note.

Reviews

No reviews yet

Please contact us

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Add review

What do you think of the article?

5,0