Danger Pour Femme Parfum 50 ml

Roja Parfums
Roja Parfums Danger Pour Femme
Roja Parfums Danger Pour Femme

Rose de Mai, gardenia and peach around a core of citrus, on clove, orris, tonka bean and vanilla: a graceful, dangerously soft floral.

€ 495,00
1 workday
  • Luxury niche fragrances in one place
  • Sample first, buy with confidence
  • Ordered before 1:00 PM, shipped the same day
  • Secure payment
Do you have a question about this product?

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Description

Danger Pour Femme

Inspiration
Roja publishes no inspiration story for Danger Pour Femme Parfum, only the composition. It speaks for itself: a bright citrus opening, a lush bouquet of rose, gardenia, jasmine and ylang-ylang with peach and violet, and a powdery warm base of orris, tonka bean and vanilla with a touch of clove.

Fragrance Family
Floral and oriental

The Olfactive Composition
Top notes: Lemon, bergamot, grapefruit, mandarin
Heart notes: Rose de mai, gardenia, jasmin de Grasse, ylang ylang, violet, peach
Base notes: Clove, patchouli, sandalwood, vanilla, Tonka bean, orris, musk

The Signature of Danger Pour Femme
The excitement lies in the balance between velvet and sting. Peach makes the roses and white flowers round and skin-like, violet adds a cool, powdery edge. Clove is the quiet provocateur in the base: a warm, slightly medicinal spice that draws the sweetness of tonka and vanilla more sharply. Orris and musk keep the finish soft and close to the skin.

What our ParfuMaria team thinks of this fragrance
We find Danger Pour Femme a scent that looks sweet at first glance and then surprises. Bright and juicy at first, lavishly floral next, with a hint of clove arriving later. Powdery orris and vanilla later settle into cashmere or silk. Autumn nights in town call for Danger Pour Femme. Perfect for wearers seeking a classic floral with a dark footnote.

© ParfuMaria

Reviews

No reviews yet

Please contact us

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Add review

What do you think of the article?

5,0