Danger Pour Homme Parfum 50 ml

Roja Parfums
Roja Parfums Danger Pour Homme Roja Parfums Danger Pour Homme
Roja Parfums Danger Pour Homme
Roja Parfums Danger Pour Homme

Lavender and tarragon above violet and jasmine, on cumin, oakmoss, vetiver, leather and ambergris: a dark, aromatic fougère.

€ 495,00
  • Luxury niche fragrances in one place
  • Sample first, buy with confidence
  • Ordered before 1:00 PM, shipped the same day
  • Secure payment
Do you have a question about this product?

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Description

Danger Pour Homme

Inspiration
With Danger Pour Homme, Roja lets the composition tell the story: an aromatic opening of lavender, lemon, bergamot and tarragon, a floral heart and a rich, mossy base with leather and ambergris.

Fragrance Family
Aromatic and leather

The Olfactive Composition
Top notes: Lavender, lemon, bergamot, tarragon
Heart notes: Violet, jasmine, lily of the valley
Base notes: Rhubarb, galbanum, clove, cumin, patchouli, oakmoss, vetiver, cedarwood, vanilla, tonka bean, leather, ambergris, musk

The Signature of Danger Pour Homme
The structure is that of a classic fougère, the family built around lavender, oakmoss and tonka. Tarragon, with its anise-like bite, joins a discreet floral core of violet, jasmine and muguet. Rhubarb and galbanum bring green, tart tension below; cumin, leather and ambergris make it warm and skin-like.

What our ParfuMaria team thinks of this fragrance
For us Danger Pour Homme is a men's fragrance in the best classic tradition. The lavender and tarragon feel at first like a freshly pressed shirt, after which the scent turns mossier and darker. Later in the day a leathery, lightly spicy warmth sits on the skin and lasts very well. A tailored suit in November or a tweed jacket in January: that is where Danger belongs. Suited to anyone who loves fougères and seeks more depth in them.

© ParfuMaria

Reviews

No reviews yet

Please contact us

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Add review

What do you think of the article?

5,0