Via Velluto Eau de Parfum 100 ml

Fabbrica Della Musa
Fabbrica della Musa Via Velluto Fabbrica della Musa Via Velluto Fabbrica della Musa Via Velluto
Fabbrica della Musa Via Velluto
Fabbrica della Musa Via Velluto
Fabbrica della Musa Via Velluto

Raspberry and incense, a heart of damask rose and peony, on Haitian vetiver, Australian sandalwood and soft leather.

€ 195,00
per unit
  • Luxury niche fragrances in one place
  • Sample first, buy with confidence
  • Ordered before 1:00 PM, shipped the same day
  • Secure payment
Do you have a question about this product?

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Description

Via Velluto

Inspiration
Anytime, anywhere, in any way. Via Velluto brings together ingredients along the old Silk Road, with a glamorous damask rose at its centre and a velvet trail behind it. The name means velvet road: soft to the touch, strong in spirit, with vetiver and the calming power of sandalwood.

Fragrance Family
Woody floral

The Olfactive Composition
Top notes: Raspberry, incense
Heart notes: Damask rose, peony
Base notes: Haitian vetiver, Australian sandalwood, leather

Perfumer
Hamid Merati-Kashani

The Signature of Via Velluto
Raspberry and incense form a striking duo in the opening, juicy and smoky at once. A lavish damask rose then unfolds, lifted by fresh peony. Haitian vetiver, Australian sandalwood and a soft leather note make the base velvety and dry.

What our ParfuMaria team thinks of this fragrance
Via Velluto is the rose scent of Fabbrica della Musa, and we find it surprisingly versatile. The raspberry makes it young and cheerful, the incense and leather lend it a dark elegance. It fits a Sunday afternoon as well as an evening gown. Clients who love rose but are not after a classic ladies' perfume are nearly always delighted by it. On skin it grows softer and closer over the hours, like a velvet scarf you no longer want to take off.

Reviews

No reviews yet

Please contact us

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Add review

What do you think of the article?

5,0