Almond Harmony Eau de Parfum 75 ml

THE HOUSE OF OUD
The House of Oud Almond Harmony
The House of Oud Almond Harmony

Orange blossom and almond above a powdery heart of iris and heliotrope, over balsams, tonka and Burmese oud.

€ 220,00
1 workday
  • Luxury niche fragrances in one place
  • Sample first, buy with confidence
  • Ordered before 1:00 PM, shipped the same day
  • Secure payment
Do you have a question about this product?

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Description

Almond Harmony

Inspiration
The almond tree is the first to bloom each year, which is why The House of Oud sees it as a sign of birth, renewal and good news. Almond Harmony tells of that kind of message: news that suddenly colours everything around you differently.

Fragrance Family
Floral and oriental

The Olfactive Composition
Top notes: Orange blossom, almond
Heart notes: Iris, jasmine, heliotrope, ylang-ylang
Base notes: Tolu balsam, Tonka bean, musk, vanilla, Peru balsam, oud

The Signature of Almond Harmony
Orange blossom and almond open light and sweet. Iris, jasmine, heliotrope and ylang-ylang make the heart powdery and floral. Tolu and Peru balsam, tonka, vanilla, musk and a thread of oud give the warm, lasting base.

What our ParfuMaria team thinks of this fragrance
Almond Harmony reminds us of an old powder compact on a grandmother's dressing table, freshened up. The orange blossom makes the opening cheerful; then comes the heliotrope with that typical almond powder you can almost taste. The oud is barely there, more a warm shadow beneath the balsams. It lasts on skin until evening, and on a wool scarf much longer. We like wearing it on cool days, with a cup of tea and a good book.

Reviews

View all reviews from our customers below

4,0
on the basis of 1 Reviews
0
1
0
0
0

Tim

Een hele subtiele almond geur die niet overheerst zoals bij de meeste, hints van fruitige ondertonen. Een heerlijk parfum!

Please contact us

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Add review

What do you think of the article?

5,0